In 3a , with the simplified derivation in 3b , both wh -phrases undergo Remerge with every higher head until they arrive in the embedded C. C contains feature-checking features that check the wh -features of where. These feature-checking features on C then become deactivated; however, even though these feature-checking features are deactivated, they are not incompatible with what , since they are the type of features that check wh -features.
As a result, what is not repelled and the derivation stalls. Stroik goes on to explain how survive accounts for Super-Raising and some multiple wh -constructions. Stroik relies heavily on features of a wh -phrase 4 , which he claims are subfeatures of a [WH] feature. Project MUSE promotes the creation and dissemination of essential humanities and social science resources through collaboration with libraries, publishers, and scholars worldwide.
Step by step : essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik
Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :.
- Modern Analysis and Applications: The Mark Krein Centenary Conference Volume 1: Operator Theory and Related Topics.
- SearchWorks Catalog.
- A Military History of Modern Egypt: From the Ottoman Conquest to the Ramadan War.
- Tense and agreement impairment in Ibero-Romance..
- ARM system-on-chip architecture.
- Dairy herd health.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page.
This collection of essays presents an up-to-date overview of research in the minimalist program of linguistic theory. The book includes a new essay by Noam Chomsky as well as original contributions from other renowned linguists. The book includes a new essay This collection of essays presents an up-to-date overview of research in the minimalist program of linguistic theory.
Get A Copy. More Details Original Title. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. To ask other readers questions about Step By Step , please sign up. Lists with This Book. The subcategorization features of the head then license certain label projections and eliminate all derivations with alternate projections. A " phase " is a syntactic domain first hypothesized by Noam Chomsky in Movement of a constituent out of a phase is in the general case only permitted if the constituent has first moved to the left edge of the phase.
- Divine Scapegoats: Demonic Mimesis in Early Jewish Mysticism!
- Elipse do VP e variação paramétrica | Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos?
- Citazioni duplicate.
- Fundamentals of Oncology, Revised and Expanded.
- The Iliad, the Athlete and the Ancient Greek Polis A Descriptive Study of Homers Iliad as Hero Myth (PhD Ottawa 2010)?
- Noam Chomsky - Citace Google Scholar;
This condition is described in the phase impenetrability condition , which has been variously formulated within the literature. In its original conception, only the v P in transitive and unergative verbs constitute phases.
The v P in passives and unaccusative verbs if even present are not phases. This topic is, however, currently under debate in the literature. According to Berwick and Chomsky, the Strong Minimalist Thesis states that "The optimal situation would be that UG reduces to the simplest computational principles which operate in accord with conditions of computational efficiency. This conjecture is In the late s, David E. Johnson and Shalom Lappin published the first detailed critiques of Chomsky's minimalist program.
Lappin et al. They compare the adoption of this paradigm by linguistic researchers to other historical paradigm shifts in natural sciences and conclude that of the minimalist program has been an "unscientific revolution", driven primarily by Chomsky's authority in linguistics. The several replies to the article in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory Volume 18 number 4 make a number of different defenses of the minimalist program. Some claim that it is not in fact revolutionary or not in fact widely adopted, while others agree with Lappin and Johnson on these points, but defend the vagueness of its formulation as not problematic in light of its status as a research program rather than a theory see above.
Much research has been devoted to the study of the consequences that arise when minimalist questions are formulated. This list is not exhaustive. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Part of a series on Linguistics Outline History Index. Grammatical theories.
- Elipse do VP e variação paramétrica!
- RFID and the Internet of Things.
- Sellafield Stories!
- Beneath the Surface | Letters | Inference: International Review of Science!
- Sitater per år!
- The Word As Scalpel: A History of Medical Sociology.
- LX Bibliography;
A minimalist program for linguistic theory. MIT occasional papers in linguistics no. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Origins, Concepts, Methods and Aims , pp. Linguistic Minimalism. Origins, Concepts, Methods and Aims.http://POTOLOKROSTOV.RU/cache/short/nerib-feeding-the.php
Noam Chomsky - Citazioni di Google Scholar
Syntax: A Generative Introduction , 2nd Edition. Chomsky's Universal Grammar: An Introduction. Third Edition. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Wiley-Blackwell; Uriagereka, Juan. Rhyme and Reason. An Introduction to Minimalist Syntax. Understanding Minimalism.